When should a guard choose to challenge a suspect instead of using a firearm?

The choice to challenge a suspect instead of resorting to a firearm is particularly relevant in situations where the potential threat is uncertain. When the nature of the threat is unclear, it is essential for a guard to assess the situation thoroughly before escalating to the use of lethal force. This approach aligns with the principles of responsible firearm use and de-escalation.

Challenging a suspect in uncertain situations allows the guard to gather more information and determine the intentions of the individual, which can help in making a more informed decision about how to proceed. It prioritizes safety and communication, reducing the risk of a violent encounter unnecessarily.

In scenarios where the suspect is unarmed or when backup is on the way, there could still be valid reasons to engage without a firearm; however, the strength of facing an uncertain threat indicates the need for caution and assessment first. Additionally, the mention of a secure location generally implies a reduced need for immediate firearm readiness, but the concept of uncertainty about the potential threat remains a more pressing and relevant consideration for determining the appropriate response.